Methodology

Archer, A., & Breuer, E. (2015). Methodological and pedagogical approaches to multimodality in writing. In Multimodality in writing (pp. 1-16). BRILL.

Black, G. B., Ramsay, A. I., Baim-Lance, A., Eng, J., Melnychuk, M., Xanthopoulou, P., … & Fulop, N. J. (2019). What does it take to provide clinical interventions with temporal consistency? A qualitative study of London hyperacute stroke units. BMJ open9(11). https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/11/e025367

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage

Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Dicks, B. (2014). Action, experience, communication: three methodological paradigms for researching multimodal and multisensory settings. Qualitative Research14(6), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113501687

Flewitt, R., Price, S., & Korkiakangas, T. (2019). Multimodality: Methodological explorations. Qualitative Research19(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118817414

Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.

Jewitt, C., & Leder Mackley, K. (2019). Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory ethnography: digital touch communication. Qualitative Research19(1), 90-110.

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In Cassell, C., Symon, G. (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257–270). London, UK: Sage.

Liedman, S. E. (2002). A lesson for life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4-5), 313-333.

Lincoln, Y., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CASage.

Matta, C. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods and Evidential Reasoning. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 49(5), 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393119862858

Noffke, S. & Somekh, B. (2011). Action research. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.). Research Methods in the Social Sciences, (pp. 94-101. London: Sage

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Picciano, A. G. (2015b). Paradigms, methodologies, methods, and the role of theory in online and blended learning research. In Conducting Research in Online and Blended Learning Environments (pp. 34-49). Routledge. (check reference, no editor, multiple authors)

Rorty, R. (Ed.). (1967). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rorty, R. (Ed.). (1992). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. University of Chicago Press.

Rorty, R., & Skirbekk, G. (2004). Striden om sanningen. Göteborg, Sweden: Daidalos.

Scott, D. & Usher, R. (2011). Researching education: data, methods and theory in educational enquiry. (2nd ed.) London: Continuum.

Schunk, D.H. (2012). Learning theories: an educational perspective. (6. ed., International ed.) Boston, [Mass.]: Pearson.